AG-2024.01-1901·quant-ph
Stressing Out Modern Quantum Hardware: Performance Evaluation and Execution Insights
Authors
- Aliza U. Siddiqui
- Kaitlin Gili
- Chris Ballance
Abstract
Quantum hardware is progressing at a rapid pace and, alongside this progression, it is vital to challenge the capabilities of these machines using functionally complex algorithms. Doing so provides direct insights into the current capabilities of modern quantum hardware and where its breaking points lie. Stress testing is a technique used to evaluate a system by giving it a computational load beyond its specified thresholds and identifying the capacity under which it fails. We conduct a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the Quantinuum H1 ion trap device using a stress test based protocol. Specifically, we utilize the quantum machine learning algorithm, the Quantum Neuron Born Machine, as the computationally intensive load for the device. Then, we linearly scale the number of repeat-until-success subroutines within the algorithm to determine the load under which the hardware fails and where the failure occurred within the quantum stack. Using this proposed method, we assess the hardware capacity to manage a computationally intensive QML algorithm and evaluate the hardware performance as the functional complexity of the algorithm is scaled. Alongside the quantitative performance results, we provide a qualitative discussion and resource estimation based on the insights obtained from conducting the stress test with the QNBM.
Submitted
24 January 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2401.13793
Summary
Researchers stress-tested a quantum computer by running increasingly complex machine-learning algorithms on it to find where and how the hardware fails, revealing capacity limits of current ion-trap devices.
- The team used a quantum machine-learning algorithm as a deliberate stress test, gradually scaling up its complexity to identify breaking points in the Quantinuum H1 ion-trap quantum processor.
- By tracking where failures occurred in the quantum computing stack (hardware, firmware, or algorithm level), they gained insights into whether bottlenecks were caused by qubit errors, classical control limitations, or algorithmic requirements.
- This methodology provides a practical benchmark for quantum hardware development, showing what kinds of real computational workloads current machines can handle before degrading.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.