AG-2024.02-1598·quant-ph
Proving security of BB84 under source correlations
Authors
- Ashutosh Marwah
- Frédéric Dupuis
Abstract
Device imperfections and memory effects can result in undesired correlations among the states generated by a realistic quantum source. These correlations are called source correlations. Proving the security of quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols in the presence of these correlations has been a persistent challenge. We present a simple and general method to reduce the security proof of the BB84 protocol with source correlations to one with an almost perfect source, for which security can be proven using previously known techniques. For this purpose, we introduce a simple source test, which randomly tests the output of the QKD source and provides a bound on the source correlations. We then use the recently proven entropic triangle inequality for the smooth min-entropy to carry out the reduction to the protocol with the almost perfect source.
Submitted
12 February 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2402.12346
Summary
Researchers show how to prove BB84 quantum key distribution is secure even when the photon source produces correlated states instead of perfectly random ones, using a practical test that bounds these correlations.
- Real quantum sources have memory effects and imperfections that create unwanted correlations—a major gap in security proofs that this work finally addresses.
- The solution is elegant: a simple source test randomly checks the output quality, and mathematical properties of entropy allow reducing the hard problem to an easier one already solved.
- This makes BB84 security proofs applicable to realistic hardware, moving quantum cryptography closer to practical deployment without assuming idealized components.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.