AG-2024.02-1765·quant-ph·cross-listed: cs.ET
MITS: A Quantum Sorcerer Stone For Designing Surface Codes
Authors
- Avimita Chatterjee
- Debarshi Kundu
- Swaroop Ghosh
Abstract
In the evolving landscape of quantum computing, determining the most efficient parameters for Quantum Error Correction (QEC) is paramount. Various quantum computers possess varied types and amounts of physical noise. Traditionally, simulators operate in a forward paradigm, taking parameters such as distance, rounds, and physical error to output a logical error rate. However, usage of maximum distance and rounds of the surface code might waste resources. An approach that relies on trial and error to fine-tune QEC code parameters using simulation tools like STIM can be exceedingly time-consuming. Additionally, daily fluctuations in quantum error rates can alter the ideal QEC settings needed. As a result, there is a crucial need for an automated solution that can rapidly determine the appropriate QEC parameters tailored to the current conditions. To bridge this gap, we present MITS, a tool designed to reverse-engineer the well-known simulator STIM for designing QEC codes. MITS accepts the specific noise model of a quantum computer and a target logical error rate as input and outputs the optimal surface code rounds and code distances. This guarantees minimal qubit and gate usage, harmonizing the desired logical error rate with the existing hardware limitations on qubit numbers and gate fidelity. We explored and compared multiple heuristics and machine learning models for training/designing MITS and concluded that XGBoost and Random Forest regression were most effective, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.98 and 0.96 respectively.
Submitted
16 February 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2402.11027
Summary
MITS is a tool that reverses the usual quantum error-correction design process: instead of simulating to see what error rate you get, you tell it your target error rate and hardware noise, and it outputs the optimal surface code settings needed.
- Quantum computers have different noise profiles, and manually tuning error-correction parameters for each one is slow; MITS automates this by using machine learning to predict the right code distance and rounds instantly.
- The tool inverts the typical simulator workflow (STIM), turning a forward 'what error rate do I get?' question into an inverse 'what parameters do I need?' question that's more useful for practitioners.
- XGBoost and Random Forest models achieved >96% accuracy, showing that the relationship between hardware noise, code parameters, and logical error rates is learnable—enabling rapid re-optimization as quantum hardware noise drifts day-to-day.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.