AG-2024.02-930·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-exnucl-exnucl-th
On the non-universality of heavy quark hadronization in elementary high-energy collisions
Authors
- Yuxuan Dai
- Shouxing Zhao
- Min He
Abstract
It has been traditionally hypothesized that the heavy quark (charm, $c$ and bottom, $b$) fragmentation is universal across different collision systems, based on the notion that hadronization as a soft process should occur at the characteristic non-perturbative QCD scale, $Λ_{QCD}$. However, this universality hypothesis has recently been challenged by the observation that the $c$- and $b$-baryon production relative to their meson counterparts in minimum bias proton-proton ($pp$) collisions at the LHC energies is significantly enhanced as compared to the electron-positron ($e^+e^-$) collisions. The conception of non-universality is unambiguously reinforced by the latest measurement of the charged-particle multiplicity dependence of the $b$-baryon-to-meson yield ratio, $Λ_b/B$, by the LHCb experiment in $\sqrt{s}=13$\,TeV $pp$ collisions at the LHC, evolving continuously from the saturation value in minimum bias $pp$ collisions toward the small value in $e^+e^-$ collisions as the system size gradually reduces. We address the multiplicity dependence of $b$-baryon production in the canonical statistical hadronization model with input $b$-hadron spectrum augmented with many hitherto unobserved states from quark model predictions. We demonstrate that the decreasing trend of the $Λ_b/B$ toward low multiplicities can be quantitatively understood from the canonical suppression on the yield of $Λ_b$, as caused by the requirement of strict conservation of baryon number in sufficiently small systems. We have therefore proposed a plausible scenario for understanding the origin of the non-universality of heavy quark fragmentation in elementary collisions.
Submitted
6 February 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2402.03692
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.