AG-2024.03-1101·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-exnucl-ex
Suppression of diffraction in deep-inelastic scattering on nuclei and dynamical mechanism of leading twist nuclear shadowing
Authors
- V. GuzeyJyvaskyla U. and Helsinki Inst. of Phys.
- M. StrikmanPenn State U.
Abstract
Using the leading twist approach (LTA) to nuclear shadowing, we calculate the ratios of diffractive and usual parton distributions for a heavy nucleus (Pb) and the proton, $R_{A/p}=(f_{i/A}^{D(3)}/f_{i/A})/(f_{i/p}^{D(3)}/f_{i/p})$, for coherent and summed (coherent plus quasi-elastic) nuclear deep-inelastic scattering. We find that $R_{A/p} \approx 0.5-1$ for quarks as well as for the ratio of the diffractive and total cross sections $[(dσ_{\rm diff}/dM_X^2)/σ_{\rm tot}]_{eA}/[(dσ_{\rm diff}/dM_X^2)/σ_{\rm tot}]_{ep}$ and $R_{A/p} \approx 0.5-1.3$ for gluons in a broad range of $x$, including the kinematics of the Electron-Ion Collider, which reaffirms the difference from the nuclear enhancement of $R_{A/p}$ predicted in the gluon saturation framework. We demonstrate that the magnitude of $R_{A/p}$ is controlled by the cross section of the interaction of hadronic fluctuations of the virtual photon with target nucleons, which explains an enhancement of $R_{A/p}$ in the color dipole model and its suppression in LTA. We argue that the black disk limit corresponds to $R_{A/p}=1$ and $R^{\rm coh}_{A/p}=0.86$ for the summed and coherent scattering, respectively. Relying on an intuitive definition of the saturation scale, we show that the ratio of the saturation scales of a heavy nucleus and proton $Q_{sA}^2(b)/Q_{sp}^2(b) \approx 1$ at small impact parameters $b$ due to the strong leading twist nuclear shadowing and diluteness of the nuclear density.
Submitted
13 March 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2403.08342
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.