AG-2024.03-428·gr-qc
A novel signal-consistency test for gravitational-wave searches of generic black hole binaries
Authors
- Stefano Schmidt
- Sarah Caudill
Abstract
We propose a novel signal-consistency test applicable to a broad search for gravitational waves emitted by generic binary black hole (BBH) systems. The test generalizes the time domain $ξ^2$ signal-consistency test currently utilized by the GstLAL pipeline, which quantifies the discrepancy between the expected signal-to-noise ratio timeseries with the measured one. While the traditional test is restricted to aligned-spin circular orbits and does not account for higher-order modes (HMs), our test does not make any assumption on the nature of the signal. After addressing the mathematical details of the new test, we quantify its advantages in the context of searching for precessing BBHs and/or BBHs with HM content. Our results reveal that for precessing signals, the new test is optimal and has the potential to reduce the values of the $ξ^2$ statistics by up to two orders of magnitude when compared to the standard test. However, in the case of signals with HM content, only a modest enhancement is observed. Recognizing the computational burden associated with the new test, we also derive an approximated signal-consistency test. This approximation maintains the same computational cost as the standard test and can be easily implemented in any matched filtering pipeline with minimal changes, sacrificing only a few percent of accuracy in the low SNR regime. However in the high SNR regime the approximated signal consistency test does not bring any improvement as compared to the "standard" one. By introducing our new test and its approximation and understanding their validity and limitation, this work will benefit any matched-filtering pipeline aimed at searching for BBH signals with strong precession and/or HM content.
Submitted
25 March 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2403.17179
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.