AG-2024.03-506·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: gr-qc
Cosmic shadows of causation
Authors
- Craig Hogan
Abstract
Cosmic structure on the largest scales preserves the pattern laid down by quantum fluctuations of gravity in the early universe on scales comparable to inflationary horizons. It is proposed here that fluctuations create physical correlations only within finite regions enclosed by causal diamonds, like entanglement in other quantum systems. Conformal geometry is used to calculate a range of angular separation with no causal correlation. Correlations of the cosmic microwave background in this ``causal shadow'' are measured to be three to four orders of magnitude smaller than expected in standard inflation models. It is suggested that this measured symmetry of the primordial pattern signifies a new symmetry of quantum gravity associated with causal horizons.
Submitted
28 March 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2403.19870
Summary
Quantum fluctuations in the early universe may only create correlations within causal regions (areas that can influence each other), leaving a detectable "shadow" of missing correlations in the cosmic microwave background that hints at a fundamental symmetry of quantum gravity.
- The authors propose that gravity's quantum ripples in inflation respect causality—correlations exist only between regions that could have interacted, much like entanglement in quantum systems.
- They measure a surprising suppression of CMB correlations at certain angular scales, roughly 1000× weaker than standard inflation predicts, suggesting something real is missing from current models.
- The finding hints that causal horizons may be a fundamental symmetry of quantum gravity, not just a classical boundary condition, opening a new window on gravity's quantum nature.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.