AG-2024.04-1279·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: hep-ph
Quantifying Scalar Field Dynamics with DESI 2024 Y1 BAO measurements
Authors
- Kim V. Berghaus
- Joshua A. Kable
- Vivian Miranda
Abstract
Quintessence scalar fields are a natural candidate for evolving dark energy. Unlike the phenomenological $w_0w_a$ parameterization of the dark energy equation of state, they cannot accommodate the phantom regime of dark energy $w(z) < -1$, or crossings into the phantom regime. Recent baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) indicate a preference for evolving dark energy over a cosmological constant, ranging from $2.6σ-3.9σ$ when fitting to $w_0w_a$, and combining the DESI BAO measurements with other cosmological probes. In this work, we directly fit three simple scalar field models to the DESI BAO data, combined with cosmic microwave background anisotropy measurements and supernova data sets. We find the best fit model to include a $2-4\%$ kinetic scalar field energy $Ω_{\rm scf,k}$, for a canonical scalar field with a quadratic or linear potential. However, only the DESY-Y5 supernova data set combination shows a preference for quintessence over $Λ$CDM at the $95\%$ confidence level. Fitting to the supernova data sets Pantheon, Pantheon+, DES-Y5, and Union3, we show that the mild tension ($n_σ< 3.4 $) under $Λ$CDM emerges from a BAO preference for smaller values of fractional mass-energy density $Ω_m < 0.29$, while all supernova data sets, except for Pantheon, prefer larger values, $Ω_m > 0.3$. The tension under $Λ$CDM remains noticeable ($n_σ <2.8$), when replacing two of the DESI BAO redshift bins with effective redshifts $z_{\text{eff}} =0.51$, and $z_{\text{eff}}= 0.706$ with comparable BOSS DR 12 BAO measurements at $z_{\text{eff}} =0.51$, and $z_{\text{eff}}= 0.61$. Canonical scalar fields as dark energy are successful in mitigating that tension.
Submitted
22 April 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2404.14341
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.