AG-2024.05-1024·quant-ph·cross-listed: cond-mat.mes-hallhep-th
Teaching ideal quantum measurement, from dynamics to interpretation
Authors
- Armen E. Allahverdyan
- Roger Balian
- Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen
Abstract
We present a graduate course on ideal measurements, analyzed as dynamical processes of interaction between the tested system S and an apparatus A, described by quantum statistical mechanics. The apparatus A=M+B involves a macroscopic measuring device M and a bath B. The requirements for ideality of the measurement allow us to specify the Hamiltonian of the isolated compound system S+M+B. The resulting dynamical equations may be solved for simple models. Conservation laws are shown to entail two independent relaxation mechanisms: truncation and registration. Approximations, justified by the large size of M and of B, are needed. The final density matrix $\hat{\cal D}(t_f)$ of S+A has an equilibrium form. It describes globally the outcome of a large set of runs of the measurement. The measurement problem, i.e., extracting physical properties of individual runs from $\hat{\cal D}(t_f)$, then arises due to the ambiguity of its splitting into parts associated with subsets of runs. To deal with this ambiguity, we postulate that each run ends up with a distinct pointer value $A_i$ of the macroscopic M. This is compatible with the principles of quantum mechanics. Born's rule then arises from the conservation law for the tested observable; it expresses the frequency of occurrence of the final indications $A_i$ of M in terms of the initial state of S. Von Neumann's reduction amounts to updating of information due to selection of $A_i$. We advocate the terms $q$-probabilities and $q$-correlations when analyzing measurements of non-commuting observables. These ideas may be adapted to different types of courses.
Submitted
29 May 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2405.20353
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.