AG-2024.05-2039·physics.comp-ph·cross-listed: cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
Performance of wave function and Green's functions based methods for non equilibrium many-body dynamics
Authors
- Cian C. Reeves
- Gaurav Harsha
- Avijit Shee
- Yuanran Zhu
- Thomas Blommel Chao Yang
- K Birgitta Whaley
- Dominika Zgid
- Vojtech Vlcek
Abstract
Theoretical descriptions of non equilibrium dynamics of quantum many-body systems essentially employ either (i) explicit treatments, relying on truncation of the expansion of the many-body wave function, (ii) compressed representations of the many-body wave function, or (iii) evolution of an effective (downfolded) representation through Green's functions. In this work, we select representative cases of each of the methods and address how these complementary approaches capture the dynamics driven by intense field perturbations to non equilibrium states. Under strong driving, the systems are characterized by strong entanglement of the single particle density matrix and natural populations approaching those of a strongly interacting equilibrium system. We generate a representative set of results that are numerically exact and form a basis for critical comparison of the distinct families of methods. We demonstrate that the compressed formulation based on similarity transformed Hamiltonians (coupled cluster approach) is practically exact in weak fields and, hence, weakly or moderately correlated systems. Coupled cluster, however, struggles for strong driving fields, under which the system exhibits strongly correlated behavior, as measured by the von Neumann entropy of the single particle density matrix. The dynamics predicted by Green's functions in the (widely popular) GW approximation are less accurate by improve significantly upon the mean-field results in the strongly driven regime.
Submitted
14 May 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2405.08814
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.