AG-2024.05-307·gr-qc
Fractal signatures of non-Kerr spacetimes in the shadow of light-ring bifurcations
Authors
- Konstantinos Kostaros
- Padelis Papadopoulos
- George Pappas
Abstract
Light-ring bifurcations that can occur for prolate non-Kerr compact objects can leave an indelible signature on SMBH shadows as a fractal sequence of eyebrow-like formations. These fractal features are the result of two properties of these spacetimes. The first is that they allow for multiple escapes for the photons (throats in the effective potential of photon geodesic motion). The second is that photon geodesics can resonate between different generalized light-rings related to the escapes, called fundamental photon orbits, that lead photons to alternate between the different exits either towards the compact object or infinity. The resulting fractal structures of the shadow seem to be a generic feature of prolate non-Kerr objects that may be observable in (accretion-disk)-illuminated compact objects, especially along equatorial lines of sight, but the best orientation depends on the specific parameters. Such fractal features if observed in the shadows of singular supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies, would be smoking gun signals of non-Kerr compact objects.
Submitted
15 May 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2405.09653
Summary
Black holes that deviate from the Kerr solution produce distinctive fractal patterns in their shadows when light bounces between multiple escape routes, offering a way to detect non-standard compact objects.
- Light can take multiple paths around certain non-Kerr black holes, bouncing between different 'exits' in a way that creates self-similar fractal structures visible in the shadow.
- These fractal eyebrow-like features emerge when photons resonate between fundamental orbits, a behavior impossible in standard Kerr black holes.
- If astronomers observe such fractal patterns in supermassive black hole shadows (like M87* or Sagittarius A*), it would be direct evidence that nature's black holes differ from Einstein's simplest predictions.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.