AG-2024.05-441·gr-qc·cross-listed: hep-th
Revisiting the dynamics of a charged spinning body in curved spacetime
Authors
- K. Andrzejewski
Abstract
We analyse the motion of the spinning body (in the pole-dipole approximation) in the gravitational and electromagnetic fields described by the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon-Souriau equations. First, we define a novel spin condition for the body with the magnetic dipole moment proportional to spin, which generalizes the one proposed by Ohashi-Kyrian-Semerák for gravity. As a result, we get the whole family of charged spinning particle models in the curved spacetime with remarkably simple dynamics (momentum and velocity are parallel). Applying the reparametrization procedure, for a specific dipole moment, we obtain equations of motion with constant mass and gyromagnetic factor. Next, we show that these equations follow from an effective Hamiltonian formalism, previously interpreted as a classical model of the charged Dirac particle.
Submitted
22 May 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2405.13784
Summary
Physicists reformulated how charged spinning objects move in curved spacetime by introducing a new mathematical constraint that makes their equations of motion dramatically simpler—revealing an unexpected connection to quantum particle theory.
- A new 'spin condition' simplifies the notoriously complex equations governing spinning charged bodies, ensuring momentum and velocity point in the same direction rather than wobbling at angles.
- The simplified model can be derived from a Hamiltonian formalism previously thought to describe quantum Dirac particles, suggesting a deep classical-quantum correspondence.
- This work unifies gravity and electromagnetism for spinning bodies in a way that may help predict orbital dynamics near neutron stars or black holes with magnetic fields.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.