AG-2024.05-451·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qcquant-ph
Probing de Sitter Space Using CFT States
Authors
- Kazuki Doi
- Naoki Ogawa
- Kotaro Shinmyo
- Yu-ki Suzuki
- Tadashi Takayanagi
Abstract
In this paper we construct CFT states describing a putative holographic dual to local excitations in the three-dimensional de Sitter space (dS), called the bulk local states. We find that the conjugation operation in dS$_3/$CFT$_2$ is notably different from that in AdS$_3/$CFT$_2$. This requires us to combine two bulk local states constructed out of different primary states in a CPT-invariant way. This analysis explains why Green's functions in the dS Euclidean vacuum cannot simply be obtained from the Wick rotation of those in AdS. We also argue that this characteristic feature explains the emergence of a time coordinate from the dual Euclidean CFT. We show that the information metric for the quantum estimation of bulk coordinate values replicates the de Sitter space metric.
Submitted
23 May 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2405.14237
Summary
Researchers construct quantum states in a 2D conformal field theory that correspond to localized excitations in 3D de Sitter space, revealing fundamental differences in how conjugation operations work compared to the better-studied AdS case.
- The conjugation operation (a symmetry transformation) behaves differently in de Sitter holography than in the more familiar Anti-de Sitter case, requiring pairs of CFT states to be combined in a CPT-invariant way.
- This asymmetry explains why you cannot simply rotate from AdS to de Sitter using standard mathematical tricks (Wick rotation), suggesting de Sitter holography is fundamentally different from AdS/CFT.
- The information metric—which quantifies uncertainty in estimating bulk spatial coordinates—naturally reproduces the geometry of de Sitter space, providing indirect evidence that the CFT construction is capturing the right physics.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.