← Recent

AG-2024.05-554·gr-qc

Metric Reconstruction in Kerr Spacetime

Authors

  • Stefan Hollands
  • Vahid Toomani

Abstract

Metric reconstruction is the general problem of parameterizing GR in terms of its two ``true degrees of freedom'', e.g., by a complex scalar ``potential'' -- in practice mostly with the aim of simplifying the Einstein equation (EE) within perturbative approaches. In this paper, we re-analyze the metric reconstruction procedure by Green, Hollands, and Zimmerman (GHZ) [Class. Quant. Grav. \textbf{37}, 075001 (2020)], which is a generalization of the Chrzanowski-Cohen-Kegeles (CCK) approach. Contrary to the CCK method, that by GHZ is applicable not only to the vacuum, but also to the sourced linearized Einstein equation (EE). Our main innovation is a version of the GHZ method giving an efficient integration scheme for the initial value problem of the sourced linear EE. By iteration, our scheme gives the metric to as high an order in perturbation theory around Kerr as one might wish, in principle. At each order, the metric perturbation is a sum of a corrector, obtained by solving a triangular system of transport equations, a reconstructed piece, obtained from a Hertz potential as in the CCK approach, and an algebraically special perturbation, determined by the ADM quantities. As a by-product, we determine the precise relations between the asymptotic tail of the Hertz potential in the GHZ and CCK schemes, and the quantities relevant for gravitational radiation, namely, the energy flux, news- and memory tensors, and their associated BMS-supertranslations. We also discuss ways of transforming the metric perturbation to Lorenz gauge.

Submitted

28 May 20241 year ago

Version

v1

License

CC-BY-4.0

DOI

10.48550/arXiv.2405.18604

Cite this preprint

Imports into BibLaTeX, Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote.

PDF

Open PDF

Opens in a new tab · v1.

Chat with this PDF

Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.

Community

Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.