AG-2024.07-111·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-ph
On the overlap reduction function of pulsar timing array searches for gravitational waves in modified gravity
Authors
- Nina Cordes
- Andrea Mitridate
- Kai Schmitz
- Tobias Schröder
- Kim Wassner
Abstract
Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) searches for gravitational waves (GWs) aim to detect a characteristic correlation pattern in the timing residuals of galactic millisecond pulsars. This pattern is described by the PTA overlap reduction function (ORF) Γ_ab(ξ_ab), which is known as the Hellings--Downs (HD) curve in general relativity (GR). In theories of modified gravity, the HD curve often receives corrections. Assuming, e.g., a subluminal GW phase velocity, one finds a drastically enhanced ORF in the limit of small angular separations between pulsar a and pulsar b in the sky, ξ_ab --> 0. In particular, working in harmonic space and performing an approximate resummation of all multipole contributions, the auto correlation coefficient Γ_aa seems to diverge. In this paper, we confirm that this divergence is unphysical and provide an exact and analytical expression for Γ_aa in dependence of the pulsar distance L_a and the GW phase velocity v_ph. In the GR limit and assuming a large pulsar distance, our expression reduces to Γ_aa = 1. In the case of subluminal phase velocity, we show that the regularization of the naive divergent result is a finite-distance effect, meaning that Γ_aa scales linearly with fL_a, where f is the GW frequency. For superluminal phase velocity (subluminal group velocity), which is relevant in the case of massive gravity, we correct an earlier analytical result for Γ_ab. Our results pave the way for fitting modified-gravity theories with nonstandard phase velocity to PTA data, which requires a proper understanding of the auto correlation coefficient Γ_aa.
Submitted
5 July 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2407.04464
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.