AG-2024.07-1506·physics.hist-ph·cross-listed: hep-phquant-ph
Quantum Field Theory and the Limits of Reductionism
Authors
- Emily Adlam
Abstract
I suggest that the current situation in quantum field theory (QFT) provides some reason to question the universal validity of ontological reductionism. I argue that the renormalization group flow is reversible except at fixed points, which makes the relation between large and small distance scales quite symmetric in QFT, opening up at least the technical possibility of a non-reductionist approach to QFT. I suggest that some conceptual problems encountered within QFT may potentially be mitigated by moving to an alternative picture in which it is no longer the case that the large supervenes on the small. Finally, I explore some specific models in which a form of non-reductionism might be implemented, and consider the prospects for future development of these models.
Submitted
29 July 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2407.20457
Summary
The author argues that quantum field theory's symmetric renormalization group flows suggest ontological reductionism (where everything reduces to fundamental particles) may not be universal, and explores whether treating large and small scales as equally fundamental could resolve conceptual problems in QFT.
- Renormalization group flows in QFT are reversible except at critical points, meaning large-scale and small-scale physics have a surprising symmetry that challenges the traditional hierarchy where small scales are more fundamental.
- This symmetry opens a technical possibility for 'non-reductionist' approaches where large-scale physics is not simply derived from small-scale physics, potentially sidestepping long-standing conceptual puzzles in quantum field theory.
- The author sketches specific models where this symmetry could be implemented, suggesting that abandoning the assumption that everything supervenes on fundamental particles might be worth exploring.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.