AG-2024.07-2244·quant-ph·cross-listed: cond-mat.mes-hall
Spin Qubits with Scalable milli-kelvin CMOS Control
Authors
- Samuel K. Bartee
- Will Gilbert
- Kun Zuo
- Kushal Das
- Tuomo Tanttu
- Chih Hwan Yang
- Nard Dumoulin Stuyck
- Sebastian J. Pauka
- Rocky Y. Su
- Wee Han Lim
- Santiago Serrano
- Christopher C. Escott
- Fay E. Hudson
- Kohei M. Itoh
- Arne Laucht
- Andrew S. Dzurak
- David J. Reilly
Abstract
A key virtue of spin qubits is their sub-micron footprint, enabling a single silicon chip to host the millions of qubits required to execute useful quantum algorithms with error correction. With each physical qubit needing multiple control lines however, a fundamental barrier to scale is the extreme density of connections that bridge quantum devices to their external control and readout hardware. A promising solution is to co-locate the control system proximal to the qubit platform at milli-kelvin temperatures, wired-up via miniaturized interconnects. Even so, heat and crosstalk from closely integrated control have potential to degrade qubit performance, particularly for two-qubit entangling gates based on exchange coupling that are sensitive to electrical noise. Here, we benchmark silicon MOS-style electron spin qubits controlled via heterogeneously-integrated cryo-CMOS circuits with a low enough power density to enable scale-up. Demonstrating that cryo-CMOS can efficiently enable universal logic operations for spin qubits, we go on to show that mill-kelvin control has little impact on the performance of single- and two-qubit gates. Given the complexity of our milli-kelvin CMOS platform, with some 100-thousand transistors, these results open the prospect of scalable control based on the tight packaging of spin qubits with a chiplet style control architecture.
Submitted
21 July 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2407.15151
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.