← Recent

AG-2024.07-423·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: gr-qchep-ph

Constraints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and DES Supernovae Data

Authors

  • Tian-Nuo Li
  • Peng-Ju Wu
  • Guo-Hong Du
  • Shang-Jie Jin
  • Hai-Li Li
  • Jing-Fei Zhang
  • Xin Zhang

Abstract

The recent results from the first year baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) data released by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), combined with cosmic microwave background (CMB) and type Ia supernova (SN) data, have shown a detection of significant deviation from a cosmological constant for dark energy. In this work, we utilize the latest DESI BAO data in combination with the SN data from the full five-year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and the CMB data from the Planck satellite to explore potential interactions between dark energy and dark matter. We consider four typical forms of the interaction term $Q$. Our findings suggest that interacting dark energy (IDE) models with $Q \propto ρ_{\rm de}$ support the presence of an interaction where dark energy decays into dark matter. Specifically, the deviation from $Λ$CDM for the IDE model with $Q=βH_0ρ_{\rm de}$ reaches the $3σ$ level. These models yield a lower value of Akaike information criterion than the $Λ$CDM model, indicating a preference for these IDE models based on the current observational data. For IDE models with $Q\proptoρ_{\rm c}$, the existence of interaction depends on the form of the proportionality coefficient $Γ$. The IDE model with $Q=βHρ_{\rm c}$ yields $β=0.0003\pm 0.0011$, which essentially does not support the presence of the interaction. In general, whether the observational data support the existence of interaction is closely related to the model. Our analysis helps to elucidate which type of IDE model can better explain the current observational data.

Submitted

20 July 20241 year ago

Version

v1

License

CC-BY-4.0

DOI

10.48550/arXiv.2407.14934

Cite this preprint

Imports into BibLaTeX, Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote.

PDF

Open PDF

Opens in a new tab · v1.

Chat with this PDF

Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.

Community

Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.