AG-2024.07-780·hep-th
Integrability in Gravity from Chern-Simons Theory
Authors
- Lewis T. Cole
- Peter Weck
Abstract
This paper presents a new perspective on integrability in theories of gravity. We show how the stationary, axisymmetric sector of General Relativity can be described by the boundary dynamics of a four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory. This approach shows promise for simplifying solution generating methods in both General Relativity and higher-dimensional supergravity theories. The four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory presented generalises those for flat space integrable models by introducing a space-time dependent branch cut in the spectral plane. We also make contact with twistor space approaches to integrability, showing how the branch cut defects of four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory arise from a discrete reduction of six-dimensional Chern-Simons theory.
Submitted
11 July 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2407.08782
Summary
Researchers show that rotating, symmetric gravitational solutions can be understood through a mathematical framework called Chern-Simons theory, revealing hidden integrable structures that could simplify how we generate new solutions in General Relativity.
- A 4D Chern-Simons theory can encode the boundary dynamics of stationary, rotating gravitational systems—connecting two seemingly different mathematical frameworks.
- This perspective generalizes previous integrable models by allowing the underlying 'spectral plane' to vary across spacetime, a technical innovation that captures richer gravity solutions.
- The approach bridges multiple mathematical languages (Chern-Simons, twistor theory) and hints at a deeper unified structure, potentially simplifying how physicists construct explicit solutions in General Relativity and supergravity.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.