AG-2024.08-350·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.CO
Observational constraints on the growth index parameters in $f(Q)$ gravity
Authors
- Dalale Mhamdi
- Safae Dahmani
- Amine Bouali
- Imad El Bojaddaini
- Taoufik Ouali
Abstract
In this study, we analyse constraints on the growth index of matter perturbations, $γ$, within the framework of $f(Q)$ gravity, using recent cosmological observations, at the background and the perturbation levels, including Pantheon$^{+}$, Cosmic Chronometer (CC), and Redshift Space Distortion (RSD) datasets. Our analysis focuses on quantifying the distortion parameter, which measures the deviation of the $f(Q)$ gravity model from the concordance $Λ$CDM cosmology at the background level. Specifically, we investigate two cases of the growth index parameter: a constant $γ$ and a time-varying $γ(z)$. We investigate various parametrizations of the growth index $γ$, expressed as $γ= γ_{0} +γ_{1} y(z)$, where the function $y(z)$ assumes different forms, including constant ($Γ_{0}$), Taylor expansion around $z = 0$ ($Γ_{1}$), Taylor expansion around the scale factor ($Γ_{2}$), and an exponential form ($Γ_{3}$). By employing the Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion, we find that the combined Pantheon$^{+}$+ CC+ RSD datasets impose stringent constraints on the value of the growth index. For the $Γ_{0}$ model, our results indicate that within the concordance $Λ$CDM model, $γ$ is constrained to $0.545 \pm 0.096$, showing strong agreement with the theoretical expectation of $γ_Λ = \frac{6}{11}$. However, within the framework of $f(Q)$ gravity, we observe $γ= 0.571^{+0.095}_{-0.110}$, slightly exceeding the $Λ$CDM value by 4.66 $\%$. Furthermore, when considering a time-varying growth index, our analysis reveals that the range of $γ_{0}$ spans from $0.596$ to $0.62$ across the $Γ_{1-3}$ models.
Submitted
21 August 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2408.11996
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.