← Recent

AG-2024.09-521·gr-qc

Simulating binary black hole mergers using discontinuous Galerkin methods

Authors

  • Geoffrey Lovelace
  • Kyle C. Nelli
  • Nils Deppe
  • Nils L. Vu
  • William Throwe
  • Marceline S. Bonilla
  • Alexander Carpenter
  • Lawrence E. Kidder
  • Alexandra Macedo
  • Mark A. Scheel
  • Azer Afram
  • Michael Boyle
  • Andrea Ceja
  • Matthew Giesler
  • Sarah Habib
  • Ken Z. Jones
  • Prayush Kumar
  • Guillermo Lara
  • Denyz Melchor
  • Iago B. Mendes
  • Keefe Mitman
  • Marlo Morales
  • Jordan Moxon
  • Eamonn O'Shea
  • Kyle Pannone
  • Harald P. Pfeiffer
  • Teresita Ramirez-Aguilar
  • Jennifer Sanchez
  • Daniel Tellez
  • Saul A. Teukolsky
  • Nikolas A. Wittek

Abstract

Binary black holes are the most abundant source of gravitational-wave observations. Gravitational-wave observatories in the next decade will require tremendous increases in the accuracy of numerical waveforms modeling binary black holes, compared to today's state of the art. One approach to achieving the required accuracy is using spectral-type methods that scale to many processors. Using the SpECTRE numerical-relativity code, we present the first simulations of a binary black hole inspiral, merger, and ringdown using discontinuous Galerkin methods. The efficiency of discontinuous Galerkin methods allows us to evolve the binary through ~18 orbits at reasonable computational cost. We then use SpECTRE's Cauchy Characteristic Evolution (CCE) code to extract the gravitational waves at future null infinity. The open-source nature of SpECTRE means this is the first time a spectral-type method for simulating binary black hole evolutions is available to the entire numerical-relativity community.

Submitted

30 September 20241 year ago

Version

v1

License

CC-BY-4.0

DOI

10.48550/arXiv.2410.00265

Cite this preprint

Imports into BibLaTeX, Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote.

PDF

Open PDF

Opens in a new tab · v1.

Chat with this PDF

Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.

Community

Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.