AG-2024.09-779·physics.data-an·cross-listed: astro-ph.COastro-ph.IMhep-exhep-phhep-th
Bayesian forecasting with information theory
Authors
- Mohammad Hossein Namjoo
Abstract
Forecasting techniques for assessing the power of future experiments to discriminate between theories or discover new laws of nature are of great interest in many areas of science. In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian forecasting method using information theory. We argue that mutual information is a suitable quantity to study in this context. Besides being Bayesian, this proposal has the advantage of not relying on the choice of fiducial parameters, describing the "true" theory (which is a priori unknown), and is applicable to any probability distribution. We demonstrate that the proposed method can be used for parameter estimation and model selection, both of which are of interest concerning future experiments. We argue that mutual information has plausible interpretation in both situations. In addition, we state a number of propositions that offer information-theoretic meaning to some of the Bayesian practices such as performing multiple experiments, combining different datasets, and marginalization.
Submitted
20 September 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2409.13802
Summary
A new Bayesian method uses mutual information to forecast how well future experiments can distinguish between competing theories, without needing to assume which theory is actually true.
- Mutual information—a measure from information theory—quantifies how much an experiment can narrow down uncertainty about which model is correct, working for any probability distribution.
- Unlike traditional forecasting methods, this approach doesn't require picking a 'fiducial' (assumed true) model beforehand, making it more objective when the ground truth is genuinely unknown.
- The framework unifies parameter estimation and model selection under one principle, and provides information-theoretic justification for standard Bayesian practices like combining multiple datasets.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.