← Recent

AG-2024.10-138·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.IM

Investigating Rotating Black Holes in Bumblebee Gravity: Insights from EHT Observations

Authors

  • Shafqat Ul Islam
  • Sushant G. Ghosh
  • Sunil D. Maharaj

Abstract

The EHT observation revealed event horizon-scale images of the supermassive black holes Sgr A* and M87* and these results are consistent with the shadow of a Kerr black hole as predicted by general relativity. However, Kerr-like rotating black holes in modified gravity theories can not ruled out, as they provide a crucial testing ground for these theories through EHT observations. It motivates us to investigate the Bumblebee theory, a vector-tensor extension of the Einstein-Maxwell theory that permits spontaneous symmetry breaking, resulting in the field acquiring a vacuum expectation value and introducing Lorentz violation. We present rotating black holes within this bumblebee gravity model, which includes an additional parameter $\ell$ alongside the mass $M$ and spin parameter $a$ - namely RBHBG. Unlike the Kerr black hole, an extremal RBHBG, for $\ell<0$, refers to a black hole with angular momentum $a>M$. We derive an analytical formula necessary for the shadow of our rotating black holes, then visualize them with varying parameters $a$ and $\ell$, and also estimate the black hole parameters using shadow observables viz. shadow radius $R_s$, distortion $δ_s$, shadow area $A$ and oblateness $D$ using two well-known techniques. We find that $\ell$ incrementally increases the shadow size and causes more significant deformation while decreasing the event horizon area. Remarkably, an increase in $\ell$ enlarges the shadow radius irrespective of spin or inclination angle $θ_0$.

Submitted

7 October 20241 year ago

Version

v1

License

CC-BY-4.0

DOI

10.48550/arXiv.2410.05395

Cite this preprint

Imports into BibLaTeX, Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote.

PDF

Open PDF

Opens in a new tab · v1.

Chat with this PDF

Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.

Community

Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.