AG-2024.10-286·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.GAhep-th
Strong Gravitational Lensing by Rotating Quantum-Corrected Black Holes: Insights and Constraints from EHT Observations of M87* and Sgr A*
Authors
- Amnish Vachher
- Sushant G. Ghosh
Abstract
We study gravitational lensing in the strong-field limit using the rotating quantum-corrected black hole (RQCBH) with an additional parameter $α$ besides mass $M$ and spin parameter $a$. We discover a decrease in the deflection angle $α_D$, the photon sphere radius $x_{ps}$, and the angular position $θ_{\infty}$. The flux ratio of the first image to all subsequent images, $r_{mag}$, decreases rapidly as $α$ increases. We compare RQCBH observables with those of Kerr black holes, using Sgr A* and M87* as lenses to observe the effect of the quantum-corrected parameter $α$. For Sgr A*, the angular position $θ_\infty$ in $\in~(14.8-26.3)~μas$, while for M87* $\in~(11.12-19.78)~μas$. The angular separation $s$, for supermassive black holes (SMBHs) SgrA* and M87*, differs significantly, with values ranging $\in~(0.033-0.79)~μas$ for Sgr A* and $\in~(0.033-0.59)~μas$ for M87*. The deviations of the lensing observables $|Δθ_\infty|$ and $|Δs|$ for RQCBH ($a=0.8,α=0.4$) from Kerr black holes can reach up to $1.6~μas$ and $0.41~μas$ for Sgr A*, and $1.2~μas$ and $0.31~μas$ for M87*. The relative magnitude $r_{mag}$ $\in~(1.81-6.82)~μas$. We also compared the time delays between the relativistic images in the 22 SMBHs at the center of various galaxies. We found that RQCBH can be quantitatively distinguished from Kerr black holes. Interestingly, the time delay for Sgr A* and M87* can reach approximately 24.95 min and 308.15 hrs, respectively. Our analysis concludes that, within the 1$σ$ region, a significant portion of the parameter space agrees with the EHT results of M87* and Sgr A*.
Submitted
15 October 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2410.11332
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.