AG-2024.10-297·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: gr-qchep-th
Breaking parity: the case of the trispectrum from chiral scalar-tensor theories of gravity
Authors
- Tommaso MorettiPhysics Dept., Naples, ITALY
- Nicola BartoloPhysics and Astronomy Dept. and INFN and INAF, Padova, ITALY
- Alessandro GrecoAstronomy Dept., Gainesville, USA
Abstract
Recently, possible hints of parity violation have been observed in the connected galaxy four-point correlation function. Although the true origin of the signal from the analysis has been debated, should they have a physical origin, they might point to primordial non-Gaussianity and would be evidence of new physics. In this work, we examine the single-field slow-roll model of inflation within chiral scalar-tensor theories of modified gravity. These theories, treated here as new Lorentz-breaking theories, extend the Chern-Simons one by including parity-violating operators containing first and second derivatives of the non-minimally coupled scalar (inflaton) field. This model is capable of imprinting parity-violating signatures in late-time observables, such as the galaxy four-point correlation function. We perform an analysis of the graviton-mediated scalar trispectrum of the gauge-invariant curvature perturbation $ζ(t,\mathbf{x})$ using one of the parity-violating operators of these theories as a case study. We estimate that for a set of parameters of the theory it is possible to produce a signal-to-noise ratio for the parity-violating part of the trispectrum of order one without introducing modifications to the single-field slow-roll setup. Even if the signal found in the analysis turns out to be spurious or if no parity violation is ever detected in the galaxy four-point correlation function, our analysis can be used to constrain the free parameters of these theories.
Submitted
15 October 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2410.11801
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.