Remarkable Scale Relation, Approximate SU(5), Fluctuating Lattice

Abstract

We discuss a series of 8 energy scales, some of which just speculated by ourselves, and fit the logarithms of these energies as a straight line versus a quantity related to the dimensionalities of action terms in a way to be defined in the article. These terms in the action are related to the energy scales in question. So e.g. the dimensionality of Einstein Hilbert action coefficient is one related to the Planck scale. In fact we suppose in the cases described with quantum field theory, that there is for each of our energy scales a pair of associated terms in the Lagrangian density, one "kinetic" and one "mass- or current" term. We use for our plotting of the energy scales the ratio of the dimensionality of say the "non-kinetic" to the dimensionality of the "kinetic" one The explanation for our phenomenological finding that the logarithm of the energies depend as a straight line on the dimensionality defined integer $q$, we give as an ontological - i.e. it really exists in nature in our model -"fluctuating lattice" with a very broad distribution of say the link size $a$.We take it Gaussian in the logarithm, $\ln(a)$. A fluctuating lattice is very natural in a theory with general relativity, since it corresponds to fluctuations in the gauge d.o.f. of general relativity. Intriguing are the lowest ones of our energy scales, being by us not described by quantum field theory as the other ones, but by actions for single particle or single string respectivily, because the string scale fits well with hadronic strings, and the particle scale is presumably the mass scale of Standard Model group monopoles, a bound state of a couple of which might be the dimuon resonance (or statistical fluctuation) found in LHC with mass 28 GeV.