AG-2024.11-120·gr-qc
Quintessence phase of the late-time Universe in $f(Q,T)$ gravity
Authors
- Shambel Sahlu
- Bhupendra Kumar Shukla
- Rishi Kumar Tiwari
- Değer Sofuoğlu
- Alnadhief H. A. Alfedeel
Abstract
In this paper, we have studied the late-time accelerating expansion of the Universe using the matter-geometry coupled $ f(Q, T) $ gravity model, where $ Q $ is the non-metricity scalar and $ T $ represents the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. We constrain the best-fit values of cosmological parameters $Ω_{m0}, H_0, α_0~\mbox{and}~ β_0$ through the Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) simulation {using 31 Hubble parameter data points from cosmic chronometers (CC) and 26 data points from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), making a total of 57 datasets (labeled \texttt{CC+BAO}), as well as SNIa distance moduli measurements from the Pantheon+ sample, which consists of 1701 light curves of 1550 distinct supernovae (labeled \texttt{Pantheon +SHOES}), and their combination (labeled \texttt{CC+BAO+Pantheon +SHOES)}}. {We compare our constrained Hubble constant $H_0$ value with different late-time and early-time cosmological measurements.} Deceleration {parameter} \(q(z)\), effective equation of state parameters \(w_{eff}(z)\), Hubble parameter $H(z)$, and distance modulus \(μ(z)\) are numerical results of dynamical quantities that show that the $f(Q, T)$ gravity model is compatible with a transition towards a quintessence-like phase in the late-time. In conformity with \(Λ\)CDM, we moreover take into account the geometrical interpretations by considering the state-finder parameters \(r-s\) and \(r-q\), which are crucial parameters for additional analysis. Additionally, the statistical analysis has been carried out for further investigation.
Submitted
7 November 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2411.04757
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.