AG-2024.11-138·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qc
Physics, Philosophy, Observers and Multiverses
Authors
- T. Banks
Abstract
We comment on the fact that certain mathematical models that have been proposed in the quantum gravity literature, may not be subject to experimental checks, even if they turn out to be mathematically well defined. This means that they would be indistinguishable from other models, with a smaller number of quantum states. These considerations follow from very general properties of quantum measurement theory and classical gravity.
Submitted
8 November 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2411.05893
Summary
Some quantum gravity models might be mathematically consistent but untestable—experimentally indistinguishable from simpler theories—because of fundamental limits in how quantum measurement and gravity interact.
- Mathematical consistency alone doesn't guarantee a theory is physically meaningful; some quantum gravity models could be experimentally unverifiable even if they're internally sound.
- The untestability arises from basic principles of quantum measurement theory combined with how gravity works, not from current experimental limitations.
- If two theories produce identical experimental predictions, they're physically equivalent even if one has more quantum states, raising questions about which models deserve to be called 'real.'
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.