AG-2024.11-819·hep-th
Positive thinking: A search for energy conditions
Authors
- Hidde Stoffels
Abstract
Energy conditions are attempts to summarise the properties of realistic descriptions of matter via constraints on the energy-momentum tensor. This is, for example, useful when one wants to understand the types of spacetime geometry that can be realised in general relativity. However, it is currently unknown what (if any) energy condition a realistic quantum theory interacting gravitationally would obey. In this thesis, we provide support for the conformally invariant averaged null energy condition (CANEC), a particular proposal towards a more generally valid energy condition. We motivate our interest in the CANEC by reviewing the role of the null energy condition (NEC) in classical gravity, summarising a general proof of the averaged NEC (ANEC) for quantum field theories in flat spacetime, and going over a holographic proof of the CANEC in a class of curved spacetimes. The context in which the CANEC applies is then extended with two proofs: a holographic proof in two types of spacetime to which the existing proof does not apply, and a field theoretical proof for conformal field theories in conformally flat spacetimes. Finally, we consider light-ray operators in Minkowski spacetime. The connection between these operators and the CANEC is that the CANEC on a lightcone in Minkowski spacetime constrains a light-ray operator for an even number of spacetime dimensions $d$. Via an explicit computation, we show that many light-ray operators are positive-semidefinite in a class of non-minimally coupled but otherwise free real scalar field theories. One of the operators for which this holds is the CANEC-operator on the lightcone for even $d$.
Submitted
17 November 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2411.11050
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.