AG-2025.01-125·astro-ph.CO
Cosmological distance forecasts for the CSST Galaxy Survey using BAO peaks
Authors
- Feng Shi
- Jieyi Tian
- Zhejie Ding
- Xiaohu Yang
- Yizhou Gu
- Christoph Saulder
- Xiaoping Li
- Yanming Liu
- Zitong Wang
- Hu Zhan
- Ming Li
- Xiaolei Li
- Hong Guo
- Yan Gong
- Yunkun Han
- Cheng Li
- Yipeng Jing
- Jipeng Sui
- Run Wen
- Gong-Bo Zhao
- Hu Zou
- Pengjie Zhang
- Xianzhong Zheng
- Xingchen Zhou
Abstract
The measurement of cosmological distances using baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) is crucial for studying the universe's expansion. The Chinese Space Station Telescope (CSST) galaxy redshift survey, with its vast volume and sky coverage, provides an opportunity to address key challenges in cosmology. However, redshift uncertainties in galaxy surveys can degrade both angular and radial distance estimates. In this study, we forecast the precision of BAO distance measurements using mock CSST galaxy samples, applying a two-point correlation function (2PCF) wedge approach to mitigate redshift errors. We simulate redshift uncertainties of $σ_0 = 0.003$ and $σ_0 = 0.006$, representative of expected CSST errors, and examine their effects on the BAO peak and distance scaling factors, $α_\perp$ and $α_\parallel$, across redshift bins within $0.0 < z \leqslant 1.0$. The wedge 2PCF method proves more effective in detecting the BAO peak compared to the monopole 2PCF, particularly for $σ_0 = 0.006$. Constraints on the BAO peaks show that $α_\perp$ is well constrained around 1.0, regardless of $σ_0$, with precision between 1% and 3% across redshift bins. In contrast, $α_\parallel$ measurements are more sensitive to increases in $σ_0$. For $σ_0 = 0.003$, the results remain close to the fiducial value, with uncertainties ranging between 4% and 9%; for $σ_0 = 0.006$, significant deviations from the fiducial value are observed. We also study the ability to measure parameters $(Ω_m, H_0r_\mathrm{d})$ using distance measurements, proving robust constraints as a cosmological probe under CSST-like redshift uncertainties.
Submitted
15 January 2025
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2501.08503
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.