AG-2025.01-192·astro-ph.CO
A New Master Supernovae Ia sample and the investigation of the $H_0$ tension
Authors
- M. G. Dainotti
- B. De Simone
- A. Garg
- K. Kohri
- A. Bashyal
- A. Aich
- A. Mondal
- S. Nagataki
- G. Montani
- T. Jareen
- V. M. Jabir
- S. Khanjani
- M. Bogdan
- N. Fraija
- A. C. C. do E. S. Pedreira
- R. H. Dejrah
- A. Singh
- M. Parakh
- R. Mandal
- K. Jarial
- G. Lambiase
- H. Sarkar
Abstract
Modern cosmological research still thoroughly debates the discrepancy between local probes and the Cosmic Microwave Background observations in the Hubble constant (\texorpdfstring{$H_0$}{H0}) measurements, ranging from 4 to 6$σ$. In the current study, we examine this tension using the Supernovae Ia (SNe Ia) data from the Pantheon, Pantheon+ (P+), Joint Lightcurve Analysis (JLA), and Dark Energy Survey, (DES) catalogs combined together into the so-called Master Sample. The sample contains 3714 SNe Ia, and is divided all of them into redshift-ordered bins. Three binning techniques are presented: the equi-population, the moving window (MW), and the equi-spacing in the \texorpdfstring{$\log-z$}{log-z}. We perform a Markov-Chain Monte Carlo analysis (MCMC) for each bin to determine the $H_0$ value, estimating it within the standard flat \texorpdfstring{$Λ$CDM}{LCDM} and the \texorpdfstring{$w_{0}w_{a}$CDM}{w0waCDM} models. These \texorpdfstring{$H_0$}{H0} values are then fitted with the following phenomenological function: \texorpdfstring{$\mathcal{H}_0(z) = \tilde{H}_0 / (1 + z)^α$}{H0(z) = H0tilde / (1 + z)^alpha}, where \texorpdfstring{$\tilde{H}_0$}{H0tilde} is a free parameter representing \texorpdfstring{$\mathcal{H}_0(z)$}{H0(z)} fitted in \texorpdfstring{$z=0$}{z=0}, and \texorpdfstring{$α$}{alpha} is the evolutionary parameter. Our results indicate a decreasing trend characterized by \texorpdfstring{$α\sim 0.01$}{alpha ~ 0.01}, whose consistency with zero ranges from $1 σ$ in 5 cases to 1 case at 3 $σ$ and 11 cases at $> 3 σ$ in several samples and configurations. Such a trend in the SNe Ia catalogs could be due to evolution with redshift for the astrophysical variables or unveiled selection biases. Alternatively, intrinsic physics, possibly the \texorpdfstring{$f(R)$}{f(R)} theory of gravity, could be responsible for this trend.
Submitted
20 January 2025
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2501.11772
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.