AG-2025.02-1029·math-ph·cross-listed: hep-th
Symplectic (Non-)Invariance of the Free Energy in Topological Recursion
Authors
- Alexander Hock
Abstract
Let $F_g$ be the free energy derived from Topological Recursion for a given spectral curve on a compact Riemann surface, and let $F_g^\vee$ be its $x$-$y$ dual, that is, the free energy derived from the same spectral curve with the roles of $x$ and $y$ interchanged. $F_g$ is sometimes called a symplectic invariant due to its invariance under certain symplectomorphisms of the formal symplectic form $dx\wedge dy$. However, the free energy is not generally invariant under the swap of $x$ and $y$; thus, the difference $F_g - F_g^\vee$ is nonzero. We derive a new formula for this difference for all $g\geq 2$ in terms of a residue calculation at the singularities of $x$ and $y$, including cases where $x$ and $y$ have logarithmic singularities. For the derivation, we apply recent developments from $x$-$y$ duality within the theory of (Logarithmic) Topological Recursion. The derived formulas are particularly useful for spectral curves with a trivial $x$-$y$ dual side, meaning those with vanishing $F_g^\vee$. In such cases, one obtains an explicit result for $F_{g\geq 2}$ itself. We apply this to several classes of spectral curves and prove, for instance, a recent conjecture by Borot et al. that the free energies $F_g$ computed by Topological Recursion for the "Gaiotto curve" coincide with the perturbative part (in the $Ω$-background) of the Nekrasov partition function of $\mathcal{N}=2$ pure supersymmetric gauge theory. Similar computations also provide $F_g$ for the CDO curve related to Hurwitz numbers, or the negative $r$-spin curve related to $Θ$-class intersection numbers on $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$.
Submitted
25 February 20251 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2502.18115
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.