AG-2025.03-439·astro-ph.CO
Early time solution as an alternative to the late time evolving dark energy with DESI DR2 BAO
Authors
- E. Chaussidon
- M. White
- A. de Mattia
- R. Gsponer
- S. Ahlen
- D. Bianchi
- D. Brooks
- T. Claybaugh
- S. Cole
- A. Cuceu
- A. de la Macorra
- P. Doel
- S. Ferraro
- A. Font-Ribera
- J. E. Forero-Romero
- E. Gaztañaga
- S. Gontcho A Gontcho
- G. Gutierrez
- J. Guy
- C. Hahn
- H. K. Herrera-Alcantar
- K. Honscheid
- M. Ishak
- D. Kirkby
- T. Kisner
- A. Kremin
- M. Landriau
- L. Le Guillou
- M. E. Levi
- R. Miquel
- J. Moustakas
- G. Niz
- W. J. Percival
- F. Prada
- I. Pérez-Ràfols
- A. J. Ross
- G. Rossi
- E. Sanchez
- D. Schlegel
- H. Seo
- D. Sprayberry
- M. Walther
- B. A. Weaver
Abstract
Recently the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) provided constraints on the expansion history from their Data Release 2 (DR2). The DESI baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements are well described by a flat $Λ$CDM model, but the preferred parameters are in mild ($2.3σ$) tension with those determined from the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The DESI collaboration has already explored a variety of solutions to this tension relying on variations in the late-time evolution of dark energy. Here we test an alternative -- the introduction of an ``early dark energy'' (EDE) component. We find that EDE models can alleviate the tension, though they lead to differences in other cosmological parameters that have observational implications. Particularly the EDE models that fit the acoustic datasets prefer lower $Ω_m$, higher $H_0$, $n_s$ and $σ_8$ in contrast to the late-time solutions. We discuss the current status and near-future prospects for distinguishing amongst these solutions.
Submitted
31 March 2025
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2503.24343
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.