AG-2025.04-1363·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-ex
Support for Gravitationally-Attractive Composite Antimatter and Gravitationally-Repulsive Non-composite Antimatter
Authors
- Giovanni Maria Piacentino
- Anthony Palladino
Abstract
The ALPHA collaboration recently published the article "Observation of the effects of gravity on the motion of antimatter" in issue 621 of Nature (2023), in which their conclusion states that "The probability that our data are consistent with repulsive gravity is so small as to be quantitatively meaningless (less than $10^{-15}$). Consequently, we can rule out the existence of repulsive gravity of magnitude 1$g$ between the Earth and antimatter." Indeed, their experiment proved that antihydrogen falls toward the Earth. Antihydrogen, however, is a composite particle and its mass, like that of the proton, is dominated by the mass of its binding energy. In this paper, we point out that their experiment only measures the gravitational effect on composite antimatter, and not free or valence antimatter particles such as antiquarks or antileptons. Here, we review the various theoretical frameworks supporting the possibility that valence antiquarks experience a repulsion of the order $g$ by the Earth's gravitational field. We show that the ALPHA collaboration's recent result may actually be consistent with a repulsive gravitational component of about 15%. Next, we review our concept for a direct interaction experiment between antiquarks and the Earth's gravitational field, which should be capable of providing irrefutable evidence of the gravitational repulsion of non-composite antiparticles. Finally, we suggest that existing data, collected by AMS-01 of daughter particles from cosmic protons interacting with the Mir space station, may help demonstrate the feasibility of our proposed experiment.
Submitted
4 April 20251 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2504.03496
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.