AG-2025.05-139·astro-ph.CO
Modelling the impact of quasar redshift errors on the full-shape analysis of correlations in the Lyman-$α$ forest
Authors
- Calum Gordon
- Andrei Cuceu
- Andreu Font-Ribera
- Hiram K. Herrera-Alcantar
- Jessica Nicole Aguilar
- Steven Ahlen
- Davide Bianchi
- David Brooks
- Todd Claybaugh
- Shaun Cole
- Axel de la Macorra
- Biprateep Dey
- Peter Doel
- Jaime E. Forero-Romero
- Enrique Gaztañaga
- Satya Gontcho A Gontcho
- Gaston Gutierrez
- Julien Guy
- Klaus Honscheid
- Mustapha Ishak
- Robert Kehoe
- David Kirkby
- Theodore Kisner
- Anthony Kremin
- Martin Landriau
- Laurent Le Guillou
- Michael Levi
- Marc Manera
- Paul Martini
- Ramon Miquel
- John Moustakas
- Seshadri Nadathur
- Gustavo Niz
- Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille
- Will Percival
- Francisco Prada
- Ignasi Pérez-Ràfols
- Graziano Rossi
- Eusebio Sanchez
- David Schlegel
- Michael Schubnell
- Hee-Jong Seo
- Joseph Harry Silber
- David Sprayberry
- Gregory Tarlé
- Benjamin Alan Weaver
- Rongpu Zhou
- Hu Zou
Abstract
In preparation for the first cosmological measurements from the full-shape of the Lyman-$α$ (Ly$α$) forest from DESI, we must carefully model all relevant systematics that might bias our analysis. It was shown in Youles et al. (2022) that random quasar redshift errors produce a smoothing effect on the mean quasar continuum in the Ly$α$ forest region. This in turn gives rise to spurious features in the Ly$α$ auto-correlation, and its cross-correlation with quasars. Using synthetic data sets based on the DESI survey, we confirm that the impact on BAO measurements is small, but that a bias is introduced to parameters which depend on the full-shape of our correlations. We combine a model of this contamination in the cross-correlation (Youles et al. 2022) with a new model we introduce here for the auto-correlation. These are parametrised by 3 parameters, which when included in a joint fit to both correlation functions, successfully eliminate any impact of redshift errors on our full-shape constraints. We also present a strategy for removing this contamination from real data, by removing $\sim$0.3% of correlating pairs.
Submitted
13 May 2025
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2505.08789
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.