AG-2025.05-409·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM
Joint inference for gravitational wave signals and glitches using a data-informed glitch model
Authors
- Ann-Kristin Malz
- John Veitch
Abstract
Gravitational wave data are often contaminated by non-Gaussian noise transients, glitches, which can bias the inference of astrophysical signal parameters. Traditional approaches either subtract glitches in a pre-processing step, or a glitch model can be included from an agnostic wavelet basis (e.g. BayesWave). In this work, we introduce a machine-learning-based approach to build a parameterised model of glitches. We train a normalising flow on known glitches from the Gravity Spy catalogue, constructing an informative prior on the glitch model. By incorporating this model into the Bayesian inference analysis with Bilby, we estimate glitch and signal parameters simultaneously. We demonstrate the performance of our method through bias reduction, glitch identification and Bayesian model selection on real glitches. Our results show that this approach effectively removes glitches from the data, significantly improving source parameter estimation and reducing bias.
Submitted
1 May 20251 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2505.00657
Summary
Researchers used machine learning to build a smarter model of detector noise spikes (glitches) in gravitational wave data, then incorporated it into parameter estimation to simultaneously recover both the glitch and the actual astrophysical signal with less bias.
- Machine-learning models trained on real glitches provide better priors than generic wavelet bases, letting Bayesian inference algorithms separate noise from genuine gravitational wave signals more accurately.
- Joint estimation of glitch and signal parameters simultaneously, rather than removing glitches beforehand, reduces systematic bias in measuring properties of colliding neutron stars or black holes.
- The method works on real detector data and can identify whether a suspicious feature in the data is truly a gravitational wave or just instrumental noise, addressing a practical bottleneck in detector calibration.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.