AG-2025.06-818·cond-mat.stat-mech·cross-listed: cond-mat.str-elhep-thmath-ph
Hydrodynamic fluctuations of stochastic charged cellular automata
Authors
- Takato Yoshimura
- Žiga Krajnik
Abstract
We study charge fluctuations of a family of stochastic charged cellular automata away from the deterministic single-file limit and obtain the exact typical charge probability distributions, known to be anomalous, using hydrodynamics. The cellular automata considered are examples of linearly degenerate systems where two distinct mechanisms of diffusion, namely normal and convective diffusion, coexist. Our formalism, based on macroscopic fluctuation theory, allows us to describe current fluctuations stemming from these two diffusive processes, and we expect it to be applicable to generic linearly degenerate systems. The derived probability distributions match the exact microscopic result and numerical simulations.
Submitted
5 June 202511 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2506.05247
Summary
Researchers solved the probability distributions for charge fluctuations in certain cellular automata by combining hydrodynamic theory with two competing diffusion mechanisms, confirming unusual statistical behavior.
- The paper shows that 'anomalous' charge distributions—ones that don't follow normal bell-curve statistics—emerge naturally from the coexistence of regular and convective diffusion in these systems.
- Macroscopic fluctuation theory, typically used for large-scale behavior, can be extended to predict exact microscopic probability distributions when a system has special symmetries (linear degeneracy).
- The approach is general enough to apply beyond cellular automata to any system where two diffusion mechanisms compete, offering a new tool for understanding non-standard statistical behavior in physics.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.