AG-2025.08-1273·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-exhep-lat
Unravelling Pentaquarks with Born--Oppenheimer effective theory
Authors
- Nora Brambilla
- Abhishek Mohapatra
- Antonio Vairo
Abstract
The hidden-charm pentaquark states $P_{c\bar{c}}\left(4312\right)^+$, $P_{c\bar{c}}\left(4380\right)^+$, $P_{c\bar{c}}\left(4440\right)^+$, and $P_{c\bar{c}}\left(4457\right)^+$, all with isospin $I = 1/2$, were discovered by the LHCb collaboration in the decay process $Λ_b^0 \to J/ψp K^-$. Although their quantum numbers remain undetermined, these states have generated significant theoretical interest. We analyze their spectrum and decay patterns-including those of their spin partners-within the Born--Oppenheimer effective field theory (BOEFT), a framework grounded in QCD. At leading order in BOEFT, we identify these pentaquark states as bound states in BO potentials that exhibit at short-distance a repulsive octet behavior and a nonperturbative shift due to the adjoint baryons masses, while asymptotically approaching the $Σ_c\bar{D}$ threshold. We further incorporate ${\cal O}(1/m_Q)$ spin-dependent corrections to compute pentaquark multiplet spin splittings. Based on the spectrum, semi-inclusive decay widths to $J/ψ$ and $η_c$, and the decay width ratios to $Λ_c\bar{D}$ and $Λ_c\bar{D}^*$, we provide the first theoretical predictions for the adjoint baryon masses, which can be confirmed by future lattice QCD studies. Moreover, our analysis supports the quantum number assignments: $J^{P} = (1/2)^-$ for $P_{c\bar{c}}\left(4312\right)^+$, $(3/2)^-$ for $P_{c\bar{c}}\left(4380\right)^+$, $(1/2)^-$ for $P_{c\bar{c}}\left(4457\right)^+$, and $(3/2)^-$ for $P_{c\bar{c}}\left(4440\right)^+$. We also present results for the lowest bottom pentaquarks.
Submitted
18 August 20258 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2508.13050
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.