AG-2025.09-346·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: gr-qchep-phhep-th
Comparing Minimal and Non-Minimal Quintessence Models to 2025 DESI Data
Authors
- Husam Adam
- Mark P. Hertzberg
- Daniel Jiménez-Aguilar
- Iman Khan
Abstract
In this work we examine the 2025 DESI analysis of dark energy, which suggests that dark energy is evolving in time with an increasing equation of state $w$. We explore a wide range of quintessence models, described by a potential function $V(\varphi)$, including: quadratic potentials, quartic hilltops, double wells, cosine functions, Gaussians, inverse powers. We find that while some provide improvement in fitting to the data, compared to a cosmological constant, the improvement is only modest. We then consider non-minimally coupled scalars which can help fit the data by providing an effective equation of state that temporarily obeys $w<-1$ and then relaxes to $w>-1$. Since the scalar is very light, this leads to a fifth force and to time evolution in the effective gravitational strength, which are both tightly constrained by tests of gravity. For a very narrow range of carefully selected non-minimal couplings we are able to evade these bounds, but not for generic values.
Submitted
16 September 20257 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2509.13302
Summary
New DESI data suggests dark energy's properties are changing over time, but standard quintessence models only modestly improve the fit. Non-minimally coupled models can match the data better but must fine-tuned to avoid violating gravity tests.
- DESI 2025 observations hint that dark energy isn't constant—it behaves differently at different cosmic epochs—but replacing it with quintessence (a dynamic scalar field) gives only marginal improvements over the standard model.
- Non-minimal coupling between a scalar field and gravity can temporarily produce the exotic behavior the data hints at (equation of state w < −1), but the light scalar field would create detectable fifth forces that existing experiments already constrain.
- Only an extremely narrow band of model parameters avoids these gravity tests, suggesting that if dark energy is evolving, it's either a coincidence or requires physics we don't yet understand—generic field theories don't work.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.