AG-2025.09-657·gr-qc
Eccentric binary black holes: A new framework for numerical relativity waveform surrogates
Authors
- Peter James Nee
- Adhrit Ravichandran
- Scott E. Field
- Tousif Islam
- Harald P. Pfeiffer
- Vijay Varma
- Michael Boyle
- Andrea Ceja
- Noora Ghadiri
- Lawrence E. Kidder
- Prayush Kumar
- Akash Maurya
- Marlo Morales
- Antoni Ramos-Buades
- Abhishek Ravishankar
- Katie Rink
- Hannes R. Rüter
- Mark A. Scheel
- Md Arif Shaikh
- Daniel Tellez
Abstract
Mounting evidence indicates that some of the gravitational wave signals observed by the LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA observatories might arise from eccentric compact object binaries, increasing the urgency for accurate waveform models for such systems. While for non-eccentric binaries, surrogate models are efficient and accurate, the additional features due to eccentricity have posed a challenge. In this letter, we present a novel method for decomposing eccentric numerical relativity waveforms which makes them amenable to surrogate modelling techniques. We parameterize the inspiral in the radial phase domain, factoring out eccentricity-induced dephasing and thus enhancing compressibility and accuracy. This is combined with a second surrogate for the merger-ringdown in the time-domain and a novel technique to take advantage of the approximate periodicity with radial oscillations during the inspiral. We apply this procedure to the $(2,2)$ mode for non-spinning black hole binaries, and demonstrate that the resulting surrogate, NRSurE_q4NoSpin_22, is able to faithfully reproduce the underlying numerical relativity waveforms, with maximum mismatches of $5\times10^{-4}$ and median mismatches of $2\times10^{-5}$. This technique paves the way for high-accuracy parameter estimation with eccentric models, a key ingredient for astrophysical inference and tests of general relativity.
Submitted
30 September 20257 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2510.00106
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.