AG-2025.10-403·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.HE
Comprehensive analysis of time-domain overlapping gravitational wave transients: A Lensing Study
Authors
- Nishkal Rao
- Anuj Mishra
- Apratim Ganguly
- Anupreeta More
Abstract
Next-generation GW detectors will produce a high rate of temporally overlapping signals from unrelated compact binary coalescences. Such overlaps can bias parameter estimation (PE) and mimic signatures of other physical effects, such as gravitational lensing. In this work, we investigate how overlapping signals can be degenerate with gravitational lensing by focusing on two scenarios: Type-II strong lensing and microlensing by an isolated point-mass lens. We simulate quasicircular binary black-hole pairs with chirp-mass ratios $\mathscr{M}_{\rm B}/\mathscr{M}_{\rm A}\in\{0.5,\,1,\,2\}$, SNR ratios $\mathrm{SNR}_{\rm B}/\mathrm{SNR}_{\rm A}\in\{0.5,\,1\}$, and coalescence-time offsets $Δt_{\rm c}\in[-0.1,\,0.1]~\mathrm{s}$. Bayesian PE and fitting-factor studies show that the Type-II lensing hypothesis is favored over the unlensed quasicircular hypothesis ($\log_{10}\mathscr{B}^{\rm L}_{\rm U}>1$) only in a small region of the overlapping parameter space with $\mathscr{M}_{\rm B}/\mathscr{M}_{\rm A}\gtrsim1$ and $|Δt_{\rm c}|\leq0.03~\rm{s}$.. Meanwhile, false evidence for microlensing signatures can arise because, to a reasonable approximation, the model produces two superimposed images whose time delay can closely match $|Δt_{\rm c}|$. Overall, the inferred Bayes factor depends on relative chirp-mass ratios, relative loudness, difference in coalescence times, and also the absolute SNRs of the overlapping signals. Cumulatively, our results indicate that overlapping black-hole binaries with nearly equal chirp masses and comparable loudness are likely to be falsely identified as lensed. Such misidentifications are expected to become more common as detector sensitivities improve. While our study focuses on ground-based detectors using appropriate detectability thresholds, the findings naturally extend to next-generation GW observatories.
Submitted
20 October 20257 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2510.17787
Summary
When gravitational wave detectors simultaneously catch two unrelated black hole collisions, the overlapping signals can masquerade as gravitational lensing, potentially fooling analysis tools into false discoveries of lensed events.
- Overlapping gravitational waves from separate binary black holes can mimic both strong lensing and microlensing signatures, especially when the two signals have similar masses and loudness.
- The time delay between overlapping signals can match the time delay produced by microlensing, creating a degeneracy that Bayesian statistical tests struggle to disambiguate.
- This confusion will get worse as detectors improve and catch more simultaneous signals, making it critical to develop methods that distinguish true lensing from overlapping-signal imposters.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.