AG-2025.12-1346·math-ph·cross-listed: hep-thmath.QAnlin.SI
Bilinear tau forms of quantum Painlevé equations and $\mathbb{C}^2/\mathbb{Z}_2$ blowup relations in SUSY gauge theories
Authors
- Giulio Bonelli
- Anton Shchechkin
- Alessandro Tanzini
Abstract
We derive bilinear tau forms of the canonically quantized Painlevé equations, thereby relating them to those previously obtained from the $\mathbb{C}^2/\mathbb{Z}_2$ blowup relations for the $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric gauge theory partition functions on a general $Ω$-background. We fully fix the refined Painlevé/gauge theory dictionary by formulating the proper equations for the quantum nonautonomous Painlevé Hamiltonians. We also describe the symmetry structure of the quantum Painlevé tau functions and, as a byproduct of this analysis, obtain the $\mathbb{C}^2/\mathbb{Z}_2$ blowup relations in the nontrivial holonomy sector of the gauge theory.
Submitted
31 December 20255 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2512.25051
Summary
Researchers connect quantum versions of Painlevé equations (fundamental nonlinear differential equations) to partition functions in supersymmetric gauge theories by deriving their bilinear tau forms and establishing a precise dictionary between the two frameworks.
- The work completes the mathematical bridge between quantized Painlevé equations and 4D supersymmetric gauge theory, fixing previously ambiguous relationships in the correspondence.
- Bilinear tau forms—special functional representations—are derived for quantum Painlevé equations, revealing hidden symmetries and providing new computational tools for these notoriously difficult equations.
- The results extend known gauge-theory dualities (blowup relations) to new sectors, suggesting that quantum integrable systems and gauge theories are deeper instances of the same underlying structure.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.