AG-2025.12-1861·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-ex
Deep-learning jet flavor tagging for precision hadronic Higgs measurements at future $e^+e^-$ Higgs factories
Authors
- Xinzhu Wang
- Yifan Zhu
- Chunxiang Zhu
- Jianfeng Jiang
- Manqi Ruan
- Kun Wang
- Haijun Yang
- Yongfeng Zhu
Abstract
Precise measurements of Higgs decays into quarks and gluons are essential for probing the Yukawa couplings of the Higgs boson and testing the flavor structure of the Standard Model. We investigate the process $e^+e^- \to ZH$ at $\sqrt{s}=240~\mathrm{GeV}$ at a future $e^+e^-$ Higgs factory, taking the CEPC design as a benchmark. The analysis focuses on events with $Z\toν\barν$ and hadronic Higgs decays $H\to b\bar b$, $c\bar c$, $s\bar s$ and $gg$. Jet flavor is identified using state-of-the-art particle-level deep neural network taggers (ParticleNet, Particle Transformer and More-Interaction Particle Transformer), whose per-jet outputs are combined with global event observables in a two-stage analysis employing XGBoost classifiers to separate the four Higgs decay modes from the dominant two- and four-fermion Standard Model backgrounds. Assuming an integrated luminosity of $20\,\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$, we obtain projected relative precision on $σ(ZH)\times\mathrm{Br}(H\to X)$ of 0.18% for $X=b\bar b$, 1.07% for $c\bar c$, 0.52% for $gg$ and 78% for $s\bar s$. Compared with the CEPC published results, the precisions for $H\to c\bar c$ and $H\to gg$ are improved by about $42%$ and $26%$, respectively. For $H\to s\bar s$ we present a quantitative sensitivity estimation corresponding to a statistical significance of about $1.3σ$. These results highlight the potential of deep-learning-based jet flavor tagging for precision studies of Higgs decays at future $e^+e^-$ Higgs factories.
Submitted
25 December 20254 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2512.21558
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.