AG-2025.12-593·gr-qc
Eckart heat-flux applicability in $F(Φ,X)R$ theories and the existence of temperature gradients
Authors
- David S. Pereira
- José Pedro Mimoso
Abstract
We show that in single--scalar theories of the form $\mathcal{L}=F(Φ,X)R+G(Φ,X)$, a generic nonminimal coupling $F(Φ,X)$ induces, in the scalar--comoving frame, an additional transverse contribution to the effective heat flux, proportional to $(F_X/8πF)V_{\perp a}$, where $V_a \equiv h_a{}^c\nabla_c\nabla_d X\,u^d$ and $V_{\perp a}$ denotes the component orthogonal to the 4--acceleration $a_a$. This term cannot in general be written as a spatial temperature gradient, and therefore obstructs a standard Eckart interpretation of the scalar sector for arbitrary timelike scalar configurations. As a result, requiring an Eckart heat flux $q_a = -K\bigl(D_a T_g + T_g\, a_a\bigr)$ for all such configurations is possible if and only if $F_X(Φ,X)\equiv 0$, i.e.\ $F(Φ,X)=F(Φ)$, resulting in a theory that is a subclass of Horndeski. Thus, only Jordan--like theories of the type $F(Φ)R+G(Φ,X)$ admit a global Eckart fluid picture of the scalar sector, while models with $F_X\neq 0$ can recover an Eckart--like form only on highly symmetric backgrounds where the transverse contribution vanishes or collapses to a single gradient direction. We also make a brief comment on the existence of temperature gradients $D_aT_g$.
Submitted
23 December 20254 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2512.20553
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.