AG-2026.01-106·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qchep-ph
More on Pre-Inflationary Non Gaussianities
Authors
- M. Meo
Abstract
I generalize the three-point amplitude of curvature perturbations in the climbing scenario inspired by ten-dimensional non-supersymmetric strings to a broader class of exponential potentials, under some assumptions on the smoothing effects of String Theory that favor a bounce Cosmology. The extension can encompass the SO(16)xSO(16) model, together with other scenarios related to supersymmetry breaking in String Theory. The e-fold ranges compatible with Planck data move toward lower values of N for milder potentials and toward larger values for steeper ones. I also compute the three-point amplitudes involving graviton modes in the same bounce scenario, showing in detail their lack of peculiar contributions from the turning point.
Submitted
5 January 20263 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2601.02234
Summary
The paper calculates how primordial density fluctuations correlate in specific string theory models with bouncing cosmologies, extending previous results to broader potential shapes and including gravitational wave contributions.
- The author generalizes theoretical predictions for non-Gaussianities (deviations from randomness in early-universe fluctuations) across a wider class of string theory models, making the framework more flexible and potentially more testable against observations.
- The work reconciles these predictions with Planck satellite data by showing how the number of inflation-like e-folds must adjust depending on the potential's steepness—a constraint that ties abstract theory to measurable cosmology.
- Adding graviton correlations to the analysis shows they don't introduce unexpected signatures at the universe's 'bounce point,' simplifying the theoretical predictions that astronomers might eventually test.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.