AG-2026.01-1083·hep-ph
Why is the $Z_c(3900)$ absent in the $h_cπ$ final state?
Authors
- Quanxing Ye
- Ying Zhang
- Peng-Yu Niu
- Qian Wang
Abstract
In this work, we perform a comprehensive phenomenological analysis of the exotic hadronic states $Z_c(3900)$, $Z_c(4020)$, $Z_b(10610)$ and $Z_b(10650)$ within the framework of Heavy Quark Spin Symmetry (HQSS) and its violation. By constructing S-wave contact interactions between elastic ($D\bar{D}^*/D^*\bar{D}^*$ or $B\bar{B}^*/B^*\bar{B}^*$) and inelastic ($J/ψπ, h_cπ$ or $Υπ$, $h_bπ$) channels, we solve the Lippmann-Schwinger equation to obtain physical production amplitudes and perform a global fit to experimental invariant-mass spectra. Our results demonstrate a striking difference between the charm and bottom sectors: HQSS violation is negligible in the bottom system, leading to comparable peak structures for both $Z_b$ states in all hidden-bottom decay channels. In contrast, significant HQSS breaking is required to describe the $Z_c$ system, where the violation is predominantly concentrated in the elastic interactions. This explains the observed selectivity: $Z_c(3900)$ appears prominently only in $J/ψπ$, while $Z_c(4020)$ appears only in $h_cπ$. Pole analysis confirms the molecular nature of the states, with the $Z_c(4020)$ likely arising from a threshold cusp effect. The model's robustness is verified against variations of the form factor and cutoff, showing stable results.
Submitted
7 January 20263 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2601.03697
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.