AG-2026.01-111·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qcquant-ph
On the temperature of the quantum black hole
Authors
- Abram Akal
Abstract
A nontrivial peculiarity of general relativity is that when the horizon region of black holes is rendered harmless, the exterior doubles, resulting in a causally disconnected parallel universe. This intricacy plays a central role in 't Hooft's unitarity arguments, emphasising an exact identification between the physical universe and its duplicate on the other side of the horizon. However, it leads to another tension in the form of a factor of two correction in Hawking's temperature. This discrepancy is concerning because the Rindler temperature is universal and complies with the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. We demonstrate that the mismatch in the Boltzmann factor gets fixed if the state that forms the corresponding density matrix adopts a generalised thermofield double structure. That leaves room for some interesting discussion.
Submitted
5 January 20263 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2601.02352
Summary
When black holes are treated quantum-mechanically with their horizons removed, the math predicts two universes instead of one—which creates a factor-of-two discrepancy in Hawking's temperature formula. The authors show this mismatch resolves if the quantum state has a special 'thermofield double' structure.
- Removing the black hole singularity in quantum gravity leads to a causally disconnected copy of the universe, which 't Hooft uses to argue information isn't lost—but this setup predicts the wrong Hawking temperature by a factor of two.
- The Rindler temperature (derived from relativity's accelerated-observer perspective) should match Hawking's result, but the doubling of spacetime breaks this agreement, creating a tension between black hole thermodynamics and quantum unitarity.
- A generalized thermofield double—a quantum state that entangles the black hole with its mirror copy—can fix the temperature mismatch, suggesting the correct quantum description involves an intricate entangled structure rather than two independent universes.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.