AG-2026.01-168·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: gr-qchep-ph
Dark QCD Origin of the NANOGrav Signal and Self-Interacting Dark Matter
Authors
- Zihan Wang
Abstract
The NANOGrav 15-year stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) amplitude $A_{\rm yr} \approx 2.4 \times 10^{-15}$ lies at the upper edge of population synthesis predictions for supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs), motivating exploration of additional cosmological sources. We present a phenomenological framework based on an $\text{SU}(3)_D$ gauge theory that can simultaneously accommodate the gravitational wave signal and resolve small-scale structure anomalies via Self-Interacting Dark Matter (SIDM). The dark matter candidate is a heavy dark baryon $χ= QQQ$ with mass $m_χ\approx 40$~GeV, which self-interacts through a light pseudo-dilaton $d$ $m_d \approx 20$--$50$~MeV as a pseudo-Goldstone boson of approximate scale invariance arising in near-conformal gauge theories with $N_f \sim 6$--$8$ light flavors. A first-order phase transition at the MeV scale, enabled by walking dynamics near the conformal window, produces gravitational waves in the PTA band. For representative parameters $T_n \approx 5$--$6$~MeV, $α\sim 500$--$1000$, $β/H_* \sim 30$--$50$, the model provides a fit to NANOGrav data comparable to SMBHB while naturally connecting the gravitational wave amplitude to the dark matter relic density through entropy dilution $D \approx α^{3/4}$. We present explicit calculations of the bounce action, bubble wall velocity, and $ΔN_{\rm eff}$, demonstrating that the benchmark parameters are theoretically consistent and cosmologically safe ($ΔN_{\rm eff} \lesssim 0.1$ for $m_π> 2m_d$). The distinctive spectral shape ($f^3 \to f^{-4}$) provides a robust prediction testable with future PTAs.
Submitted
7 January 20263 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2601.04340
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.