AG-2026.01-353·gr-qc
Bayesian Inference of Neutron Star Properties in $f(Q)$ Gravity Using NICER Observations
Authors
- Sneha Pradhan
- N. K. Patra
- Kai Zhou
- P. K. Sahoo
Abstract
In this work, we investigate neutron stars (NSs) in the strong field regime within the framework of symmetric teleparallel $f(Q)$ gravity, considering three representative models: linear, logarithmic, and exponential. While Bayesian studies of NS observations are well established in general relativity and curvature based modified gravity theories, such analyses in $f(Q)$ gravity remain largely unexplored. For the first time we perform a Bayesian inference analysis by confronting theoretical NS mass-radius predictions with NICER observations of PSR J0030+0451, PSR J0740+6620, PSR J0437+4715, and PSR J0614+3329 in the background of nonmetricity based gravity. The dense matter equation of state is fixed to DDME2 in order to isolate the effects of modified gravity on NS structure. Our results show that the exponential $f(Q)$ model is statistically preferred over the linear and logarithmic cases, as confirmed by Bayes factor comparisons, and exhibits well-constrained. For this model, we obtain a radius and tidal deformability at $1.4\,M_\odot$ of $R_{1.4} = 11.27^{+0.53}_{-0.36}\,\mathrm{km}$ and $Λ_{1.4} = 156.95^{+84.02}_{-41.73}$, respectively, consistent with current observational constraints. Remarkably, all three constrained models predict maximum neutron star masses reaching $M_{\max} \simeq 2.98\,M_{\odot}$, with the $95\%$ confidence regions extending into the lower mass gap ($\sim 2.5$--$5\,M_{\odot}$). This mass-gap prediction emerges naturally from the Bayesian-constrained parameter space. These results highlight the potential of NSs as powerful probes of symmetric teleparallel gravity in the strong field regime.
Submitted
17 January 20263 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2601.16227
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.