AG-2026.01-651·hep-th·cross-listed: cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elhep-phnucl-th
Effective field theory for dissipative photons from higher-form symmetries
Authors
- Genki YoshimuraDepartment of Physics, The University of Osaka, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 650-0043, Japan
- Yukinao AkamatsuDepartment of Physics, The University of Osaka, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 650-0043, Japan
- Yuji HironoInstitute of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennōdai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8573, Japan
Abstract
Recent developments in generalized symmetries have provided new insights into quantum field theories. Within this framework, photons can be understood as Nambu-Goldstone modes associated with a spontaneously broken higher-form symmetry. In this work, we develop an effective field theory that builds on this symmetry structure to describe the real-time dynamics of photons in insulating media at finite temperature. Combining the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism with the generalized coset construction, we formulate a symmetry-based effective action that incorporates both conservative and dissipative effects. The effective theory implements the dynamical Kubo-Martin-Schwinger symmetry, ensuring consistency with the fluctuation-dissipation relation and Onsager's reciprocal relations. Within this framework, we derive the entropy current associated with dissipative photon dynamics and demonstrate the non-negativity of its divergence, in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics. We also clarify the symmetry origin of the gauge redundancy in the unbroken phase within the Schwinger-Keldysh framework, relating it to strong and weak realizations of higher-form symmetries. Our results provide a model-independent effective description of photon dynamics in insulating media at finite temperature.
Submitted
2 January 20263 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2601.00605
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.